- Sand Castle Days Continued Despite Unexpected Weather
- Ready for District
- Discussion of Garbage Dumpster Rates, Agreements Between State & City on Highway Regulations, and More
- 31st Annual Shrimp Cook-Off is Right Around the Corner
- LFHS Cross Country
- Local Company is Helping People With a Mission in Mind
- Valley Native Bringing Advanced Oncology Services To UT Health RGV Cancer and Surgery Center
- Los Fresnos Annual Cook-Off Is Right Around The Corner
- Los Fresnos Falcons Hold Meet and Greet for the Community
- Los Fresnos Locals Open Up a New Business in Town
Child Advocates Challenge Tax Cuts for Top Earners
- Updated: May 22, 2015
by Eric Galatas/TNS
The Texas House of Representatives has passed HB 31 and HB 32, which call for nearly $5 billion in sales and business tax cuts. The bills’ sponsors say the measures will save a family of four $172 a year. Critics argue the state needs to invest surpluses in children and infrastructure. Photo: Texas Sunset Advisory Commission.
AUSTIN, Texas – The Texas House passed nearly $5 billion in sales and business tax cuts earlier this week. Proponents say the move will boost the economy and put an additional $172 into a family of four’s pockets. Critics warn tax cuts mean reduced funding for public schools, health care and social services this year and in the future.
Texas already ranks among the 10 lowest-taxed states, said Patrick Bresette, executive director of the Children’s Defense Fund, adding that there are better ways to invest state surpluses.
“I think it’s very irresponsible for our leaders to be talking about tax cuts when child well-being in Texas ranks 43rd nationally,” he said. “The fact that we have money to spend right now means we should be investing it in our kids, our families and infrastructure.”
Bresette was citing a report from the Annie E. Casey Foundation that measured childhood economic, education, health, family and community well-being. You get what you don’t pay for, he said.
A recent study by the Kaiser Family Foundation ranked Texas 48th in state spending per resident.
Public interest groups argue that it’s bad strategy to choose tax cuts over investments that could bring billions of federal health-care dollars into the state.
The House cuts were put forward by Rep. Dennis Bonnen, R-Angleton. Bresette said 17,000 of Bonnen’s constituents lack health insurance, leaving county homeowners on the hook to pay almost $20 million a year to offset the cost of patients who can’t pay.
“These kinds of tax cuts that we see are actually going to benefit not those who need it the most but actually those who probably don’t,” he said. “A good 40 percent of the benefit of these tax cuts goes to the top fifth (of) earners in the state.”
Bresette said accepting federal health-care funding would dramatically reduce the number of the state’s uninsured, and would take a greater burden off taxpayers than sales tax cuts and cuts for businesses.
The House bills, HB 31 and HB 32, could be heard by the Senate as early as next week.
The KFF report is online at kff.org. The AEC report is at datacenter.kidscount.org.